Rispondi alla discussione

JavaScript è disabilitato. Per una migliore esperienza di navigazione attivalo nel tuo programma o nella tua app per navigare prima di procedere.

Testo: <blockquote data-quote="kmer71" data-source="post: 6470224" data-attributes="member: 77846">Questo è quello che riporta Dcrainmaker che, a sensazione, sembra molto vicino alla verità :)So in this case, Favero isn’t providing PCO, but is providing the remainder of metrics. Platform Center Offset is typically used in bike fit type situations where you might adjust the cleat positioning slightly to get you more centered. It’s somewhat peculiar that Favero selected not to adopt this, since this is actually one of the aspects that’s had some uptake in terms of usefulness of the greater cycling dynamics suite.To that end, Favero does have an explanation:“For the moment, we have decided not to include the PCO Dynamic, since part of the resources that would be used to returnthis parameter with such precision as to make it really useful for the analysis of the position of the foot are currently used inthe IAV Power accuracy assurance system.So, even if technically possible, we preferred not to implement this metric. Instead, we kept all the resources employed toensure the accuracy of power measurement with any style of pedaling. We believe that this is the best choice and more faithfulto our motto “Ride Hard Facts”.  We certainly do not rule out the implementation of other advanced metrics.”So, to translate that into simple English: “Our internal hardware doesn’t support it.”They’re basically saying that the internal bits that would normally do that work are already busy maintaining accuracy, and thus they can’t dedicate that capability to PCO.</blockquote>

Verifica Anti SPAM

Alto Basso

Cerca

Cerca

Rispondi alla discussione