Cerca
Cerca solo tra i titoli
Da:
Cerca solo tra i titoli
Da:
Menu
Home
Allerta prezzi
Forum
Nuovi Messaggi
Cerca...
Iscritti
Visitatori online
Novità
Nuovi Messaggi
Nuovi media
Nuovi commenti media
Ultime Attività
Nuove inserzioni nel mercatino
Nuovi commenti nel mercatino
Mercatino
Nuove inserzioni
Nuovi commenti
Latest reviews
Cerca nel mercatino
Feedback
Guarda le statistiche
Training Camp
Pianificazione
MTB
Media
Nuovi media
Nuovi commenti
Cerca media
EBIKE
Accedi
Registrati
Cerca
Cerca solo tra i titoli
Da:
Cerca solo tra i titoli
Da:
Nuovi Messaggi
Cerca...
Iscritti
Visitatori online
Menu
Install the app
Installa
Rispondi alla discussione
JavaScript è disabilitato. Per una migliore esperienza di navigazione attivalo nel tuo programma o nella tua app per navigare prima di procedere.
Stai usando un browser molto obsoleto. Puoi incorrere in problemi di visualizzazione di questo e altri siti oltre che in problemi di sicurezza. .
Dovresti aggiornarlo oppure
usarne uno alternativo, moderno e sicuro
.
Home
Forum
Spazio Forum
Archivio
Vecchi articoli
La rottura tra Cavendish e Sky
Testo
<blockquote data-quote="xtrncpb" data-source="post: 4493489" data-attributes="member: 30438"><p>Interessante l'intervista di Mark Cavendish al <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/cycling/mark-cavendish/10428782/Mark-Cavendish-The-day-I-knew-it-was-all-over-with-Sky.html" target="_blank">Telegraph</a>...</p><p>C'è anche un bellissimo articolo correlato, <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/cycling/mark-cavendish/10428756/Mark-Cavendish-Lance-Armstrong-was-mesmeric-he-had-me-under-his-spell.html" target="_blank">Mark Cavendish: Lance Armstrong was mesmeric &#8211; he had me under his spell</a>, nel quale Mark focalizza l'attenzione anche sul doping, nel ciclismo e in altri sport.</p><p></p><p><img src="http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02724/cavendish_2724528b.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>Qui un suo passaggio, l'ultima parte dell'intervista, che fa indubbiamente riflettere:</p><p></p><p><em>My other persistent frustration is the discrepancy between our sport and others. Take tennis. Five years after the UCI, the International Tennis Federation finally got its biological passport up and running in 2013. <strong>In 2011 a grand total of 21 out-of competition blood tests were carried out in tennis, as against the 4,613 in cycling.</strong></em></p><p><em>You consider this, then you hear Andre Agassi saying that &#8220;tennis has always led the way in anti-doping&#8221; or Marion Bartoli insisting that &#8220;doping doesn&#8217;t exist in tennis&#8221;. I don&#8217;t want to pick on one sport in the way that others have singled out cycling, but how can she be so confident when, over more than a decade, Lance alone sailed through hundreds of tests?</em></p><p><em>The problem with statements like Agassi&#8217;s and Bartoli&#8217;s is that they perpetuate the narrative that <strong>the public has been hearing for years &#8211; that cycling is riddled with doping and other sports are clean.</strong></em></p><p><em>In 2011 the UCI became the first governing body in any sport to ban all injections of even legal products aiding recovery. There was a feeling in cycling that a &#8216;needle culture&#8217; had been allowed to develop over several decades and anecdotal evidence suggested that legal injections were often a precursor to more serious stuff.</em></p><p><em>Again, I&#8217;m loath to pick on tennis, but the discrepancy was brought home to me again when I heard Tim Henman matter-of-factly answering a question about players recovering after five-set matches and explaining that <strong>they would just use an intravenous drip. Perfectly fine, perfectly legal in that sport, but strictly forbidden for us.</strong></em></p><p><em>Even so, I welcome the needle ban: anything to ensure that the doping plague that had taken a grip of cycling doesn&#8217;t return; and anything to hopefully make people realise that <strong>we&#8217;re light years ahead of other sports in the war on drugs.</strong></em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="xtrncpb, post: 4493489, member: 30438"] Interessante l'intervista di Mark Cavendish al [URL="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/cycling/mark-cavendish/10428782/Mark-Cavendish-The-day-I-knew-it-was-all-over-with-Sky.html"]Telegraph[/URL]... C'è anche un bellissimo articolo correlato, [URL="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/cycling/mark-cavendish/10428756/Mark-Cavendish-Lance-Armstrong-was-mesmeric-he-had-me-under-his-spell.html"]Mark Cavendish: Lance Armstrong was mesmeric – he had me under his spell[/URL], nel quale Mark focalizza l'attenzione anche sul doping, nel ciclismo e in altri sport. [IMG]http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02724/cavendish_2724528b.jpg[/IMG] Qui un suo passaggio, l'ultima parte dell'intervista, che fa indubbiamente riflettere: [I]My other persistent frustration is the discrepancy between our sport and others. Take tennis. Five years after the UCI, the International Tennis Federation finally got its biological passport up and running in 2013. [B]In 2011 a grand total of 21 out-of competition blood tests were carried out in tennis, as against the 4,613 in cycling.[/B] You consider this, then you hear Andre Agassi saying that “tennis has always led the way in anti-doping” or Marion Bartoli insisting that “doping doesn’t exist in tennis”. I don’t want to pick on one sport in the way that others have singled out cycling, but how can she be so confident when, over more than a decade, Lance alone sailed through hundreds of tests? The problem with statements like Agassi’s and Bartoli’s is that they perpetuate the narrative that [B]the public has been hearing for years – that cycling is riddled with doping and other sports are clean.[/B] In 2011 the UCI became the first governing body in any sport to ban all injections of even legal products aiding recovery. There was a feeling in cycling that a ‘needle culture’ had been allowed to develop over several decades and anecdotal evidence suggested that legal injections were often a precursor to more serious stuff. Again, I’m loath to pick on tennis, but the discrepancy was brought home to me again when I heard Tim Henman matter-of-factly answering a question about players recovering after five-set matches and explaining that [B]they would just use an intravenous drip. Perfectly fine, perfectly legal in that sport, but strictly forbidden for us.[/B] Even so, I welcome the needle ban: anything to ensure that the doping plague that had taken a grip of cycling doesn’t return; and anything to hopefully make people realise that [B]we’re light years ahead of other sports in the war on drugs.[/B][/I] [/QUOTE]
Riporta citazioni...
Verifica Anti SPAM
Invia risposta
Home
Forum
Spazio Forum
Archivio
Vecchi articoli
La rottura tra Cavendish e Sky
Alto
Basso