Rispondi alla discussione

JavaScript è disabilitato. Per una migliore esperienza di navigazione attivalo nel tuo programma o nella tua app per navigare prima di procedere.

Testo: <blockquote data-quote="Ser pecora" data-source="post: 6049799" data-attributes="member: 1850">Visto che quello che dico io è ignorato, faccio parlare l'UCI, che nel "Lugano Charter" del 1996, ha introdotto le nuove regole con queste motivazioni:New prototypes can be developed because they do not have to take into account constraints such as safety, a comfortable riding position, accessibility of the controls, manoeuvrability of the machine, etc. The bicycle is losing its user-friendliness and distancing itself from a reality which can be grasped and understood. Priority is increasingly given to form. The performance achieved depends more on the form of the man-machine ensemble than the physical qualities of the rider, and this goes against the very meaning of cycle sport.The many effects of this rush to extremes risk damaging the sport of cycling. These include spiralling costs, unequal access to technology, radical innovations prepared in secret, a fait accompli policy, damage to the image of cycle sport and the credibility of performances and the advent of a technocratic form of cycling where power is concentrated in the hands of a few powerful players, to the detriment of the universality of the sport on which its future and continued development depend.Dire che la sicurezza non era proprio la priorità.<a href="http://oldsite.uci.ch/imgarchive/Road/Equipment/The%20Lugano%20charter.pdf" target="_blank">http://oldsite.uci.ch/imgarchive/Road/Equipment/The Lugano charter.pdf</a></blockquote>

Verifica Anti SPAM

Alto Basso

Cerca

Cerca

Rispondi alla discussione