Rispondi alla discussione

JavaScript è disabilitato. Per una migliore esperienza di navigazione attivalo nel tuo programma o nella tua app per navigare prima di procedere.

Testo: <blockquote data-quote="sepica" data-source="post: 7789466" data-attributes="member: 2116"><p>This study has several implications for the <a href="https://www.nasm.org/become-a-personal-trainer" target="_blank">NASM-CPT</a>. First, this is further evidence that a partial range of motion <a href="https://blog.nasm.org/ces/squat-form/" target="_blank">squat</a> is better than no squat. A <a href="https://blog.nasm.org/newletter/diving-deeper-squat-common-misconceptions/" target="_blank">full squat</a> requires optimal flexibility and range of motion from the ankle, knee, and hip, as well as, total body coordination and strength. While a full range of motion should be the desired end-goal, clients that don’t have the flexibility or strength to achieve it will benefit from the partial squat. Second, a partial squat should also be considered if a client can’t obtain a full squat due to a structural dysfunction or previous surgical alteration. Squatting to just 90° of hip flexion is enough to generate a significant contraction within the gluteus maximus, biceps femoris, erector spinae, and soleus. Third, this study normalized the load for the conditions. So, if using a partial squat more load should be applied to get similar results. Lastly, it should be noted that this should not be used to completely replace a full squat unless the client has permanent limitations. When the client demonstrates functional dysfunctions (short muscles, lack of strength, lack of neuromuscular control, etc.) use this as a temporary method to improve control and strength as flexibility and coordination are worked on to eventually achieve a full range of motion squat.</p></blockquote><p></p>

Verifica Anti SPAM

Alto Basso

Cerca

Cerca

Rispondi alla discussione